000 04420nam a2200517 i 4500
001 8555421
003 IEEE
005 20220712204928.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 181218s2018 mau ob 001 eng d
020 _a9780262348560
_qelectronic bk.
020 _z026234856X
_qelectronic bk.
020 _z9780262038621
020 _z0262038625
035 _a(CaBNVSL)mat08555421
035 _a(IDAMS)0b000064888bc14d
040 _aCaBNVSL
_beng
_erda
_cCaBNVSL
_dCaBNVSL
050 4 _aTJ211.49
_b.G88 2018eb
082 0 4 _a179
_223
100 1 _aGunkel, David J.,
_eauthor.
_925476
245 1 0 _aRobot rights /
_cDavid J. Gunkel.
264 1 _aCambridge, Massachusetts :
_bMIT Press,
_c[2018]
264 2 _a[Piscataqay, New Jersey] :
_bIEEE Xplore,
_c[2018]
300 _a1 PDF (256 pages).
336 _atext
_2rdacontent
337 _aelectronic
_2isbdmedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aIntro; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Research Question; Organization and Method; Outcomes and Results; 1 Thinking the Unthinkable; 1.1 Robot; 1.2 Rights; 1.3 Robot Rights or the Unthinkable; 1.4 Summary; 2 !S1.!S2: Robots Cannot Have Rights; Robots Should Not Have Rights; 2.1 Default Understanding; 2.2 Literally Instrumental; 2.3 Instrumentalism at Work; 2.4 Duty Now and for the Future; 2.5 Complications, Difficulties, and Potential Problems; 2.6 Summary; 3 S1.S2: Robots Can Have Rights; Robots Should Have Rights; 3.1 Evidence, Instances, and Examples
505 8 _a3.2 Complications, Difficulties, and Potential Problems3.3 Summary; 4 S1 !S2: Although Robots Can Have Rights, Robots Should Not Have Rights; 4.1 The Argument; 4.2 Complications, Difficulties, and Potential Problems; 4.3 Summary; 5 !S1 S2: Even If Robots Cannot Have Rights, Robots Should Have Rights; 5.1 Arguments and Evidence; 5.2 Complications, Difficulties, and Potential Problems; 5.3 Summary; 6 Thinking Otherwise; 6.1 Levinas 101; 6.2 Applied (Levinasian) Philosophy; 6.3 Complications, Difficulties, and Potential Problems; 6.4 Summary; Notes; Introduction; Chapter 1; Chapter 2; Chapter 3
505 8 _aChapter 4Chapter 5; Chapter 6; References; Index
506 _aRestricted to subscribers or individual electronic text purchasers.
520 8 _aWe are in the midst of a robot invasion, as devices of different configurations and capabilities slowly but surely come to take up increasingly important positions in everyday social reality-self-driving vehicles, recommendation algorithms, machine learning decision making systems, and social robots of various forms and functions. Although considerable attention has already been devoted to the subject of robots and responsibility, the question concerning the social status of these artifacts has been largely overlooked. 0In this book, David Gunkel offers a provocative attempt to think about what has been previously regarded as unthinkable: whether and to what extent robots and other technological artifacts of our own making can and should have any claim to moral and legal standing.In his analysis, Gunkel invokes the philosophical distinction (developed by David Hume) between "is" and "ought" in order to evaluate and analyze the different arguments regarding the question of robot rights. In the course of his examination, Gunkel finds that none of the existing positions or proposals hold up under scrutiny. In response to this, he then offers an innovative alternative proposal that effectively flips the script on the is/ought problem by introducing another, altogether different way to conceptualize the social situation of robots and the opportunities.
530 _aAlso available in print.
538 _aMode of access: World Wide Web
588 0 _aPrint version record.
650 0 _aRobots
_xHuman factors.
_925477
650 0 _aRobots
_xMoral and ethical aspects.
_925478
655 4 _aElectronic books.
_93294
710 2 _aIEEE Xplore (Online Service),
_edistributor.
_925479
710 2 _aMIT Press,
_epublisher.
_925480
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aGunkel, David J.
_tRobot rights.
_dCambridge, MA : MIT Press, [2018]
_z9780262038621
_w(DLC) 2018013459
_w(OCoLC)1029804776
856 4 2 _3Abstract with links to resource
_uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=8555421
942 _cEBK
999 _c73567
_d73567